KAILASH NATH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) A. S Tripathl, J. Heard learned Counsel for the revisionists and learned A. G. A. for State. Learned Magistrate has passed an order under Section 111, Cr. P. C. calling upon the revisionists to show-cause on the date fixed on 8- H-1993 or to furnish the bond of Rs. 25,000 and sureties of the same amount.

(2.) A perusal of the Section 111, Cr. P. C. shows that it is the duty of the Magistrate to proceed under the provisions of Sections 107, 108, 109 and 110, Cr. P. C. and enquire upon the information received, the Magistrate has to set forth the substance of the information and call upon the person concerned to show-cause as to why the amount of the bond to be executed the terms for which it is to be in force and the number, character and class of sureties, is specified. In this particular case the learned Magistrate has psssed this order on an information received from the S. H. O. Kydganj, Allahabad and calling upon the revisionists to show-cause as to why they could not be held to furnish the bonds required fixing 8- 11-1993.