MISRI LAL SHAH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) M. C. Agarwal, J. These are applications under Section 482, Cr. P. C. , seeking to quash th complaints lodged against the applicants under Section 630 of the Companies Act.

(2.) SINCE the points involved in all these cases are identical, with the consent of parties, they were heard together and are disposed of by this common order.

(3.) THE employer respondents filed counter-affidavits and the learned counsel for the applicants wanted time to file rejoinder-affidavits. THE learned counsel for the employer respondents then stated that he would not rely on the counter-affidavits and, therefore, the cases were heard on the agreement that the counter-affidavits filed by the employer respondents would not be looked into.