UGRASEN SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) K. Narayan, J. The petitioners have approached this Court forgetting the order dated 26-3-1993 rendered by Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur quashed. This order relates to case crime No. 48 of 1993.

(2.) THE facts giving rise to the present writ petition may be briefly narrat ed. It appears that a first information report was lodged against these peti tioners at the above said crime number under Sections 336, 504, 506, 323 and 427 I. P. C. THEy moved the court and were admitted to bail. Subsequently on 26- 3-1993, the police submitted a report conveying that in view of the report of the Medical Officer, the case was converted into one under Section 308 I. P. C. vide Rapat No. 25 of the G. D. dated 23-3-199j. It was desired that the accused persons be summoned through warrants and arrested for the offence under Section 308, I. P. C. THE learned Magistrate directed by the impugned order of the date that the accused persons be summoned through non-bailable warrants. It is against this order that the petitioners have approached this order that the petitioners have approached this Court for a direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.