BRIGADIER R C DHINGRA Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) K. C. Bhargara, J. This is a petition under Section 482, Cr. P. C.

(2.) LEARNED counsel for the applicants and the State counsel have been heard. LEARNED counsel for the applicants has argued that on 30-3-1993 the case was fixed before the learned Trial Magistrate for arguments as to whether the accused should be discharged or the charge be framed against them. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners on that date the accused persons, who are the petitioners in the present case, were not present on account of illness and an application for their exemption was moved. LEARNED counsel also argued that the counsel for the accused who were present was prepared to argue the matter on the question as to whether the charge should be framed or not framed against accused. According t a the learned counsel the learned Magistrate dismissed the application for exemption and issued non-bailable warrant of arrest.