RAJENDAR PRASAD MISHRA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) A. S. Tripathi, J. This revision is directed against an order dated 7-9-J993 passed by Vith Addl, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Allahabad in Criminal Case No. 1021 of 1993 directing that application under Section 156 (3), Cr. P. C. , he treated as complaint.

(2.) I have heard learned Counsel for the revisionist and learned A. G. A. appearing for the State.

(3.) AFTER hearing learned Counsel for the revisionist and the learned A. G. A. appearing for the State it appears that the learned Magistrate while treating the application under Section 156 (3), Cr. P. C. , as a complaint finally refused the prayer of investigation of the case by the police. This refusal of the said prayer is final order and it could not be argued that the revision was not maintainable in view of the fact that the impugned order was interlocutory.