ARJUN Vs. BOARD OF REVENUE U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the impugned orders passed by Respondents Nos. 1 to 3.

(2.) BY these orders the lease, which was granted to the petitioners by the Land Management Committee on 26-8-79, has been cancelled. The order of cancellation of the lease passed by Respondent No. 3 has been confirmed by the Respondents Nos. 1 and 2.

(3.) LEARNED counsel next contended that as against the leased out land some other land has been allotted in the Chak of the petitioners and as such cancellation could not be done and the petitioners could not be dispossessed from the land allotted to them during consolidation operation as against the leased out land. I am unable to agree with this contention.