ROOP CHAND Vs. DIN DAYAL AND ANOTHER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) (sic) has been filed against an order (sic) Plaintiff Din Dayal had filed (sic) recovery of Rs. 10,000/ - from decree (sic) Roop Chand or from any (sic) ant who may be liable. The (sic) framed four issues, which are as follows:

(2.) WHETHER the Plaintiff is entitled to claim his share of profits? If so, what and against which of the Defendants?

(3.) PLAINTIFF 's relief ? The trial court decided the first issue in favour of the Plaintiff and found that Sit he Plaintiff was a co -sharer in the bus and the permit to the extent of one -fourth share Issue No. 3 was decided against the Plaintiff and hints held that the suit was not maintainable. Issues 2 and 4 were not decided in view of the decision on issue No. 3.