(1.) The instant petition has been filed challenging the order dtd. 14/6/2023 passed by respondent no. 2 i.e. Assistant Regional Transport Officer (Administration), Bareilly and for a mandamus restraining respondent no. 2 from issuing fresh Registration Certificate in favour of respondent no. 3.
(2.) The facts in brief are that the petitioner had taken finance from respondent no. 3 for purchasing a truck bearing Registration No. UP25 CT-6625. In the writ petition, the petitioner has not disclosed the amount of finance/assistance taken by him from the said respondent, however, it is stated in paragraph no. 5 of the writ petition that the petitioner had contributed Rs.8,00,000.00 out of Rs.42,00,000.00, the total price at which the truck was purchased. Meaning thereby that the remaining amount was financed by respondent no. 3. It was to be returned by the petitioner in monthly installments.
(3.) It is also admitted in the writ petition that the petitioner could not deposit the monthly installments. It appears that respondent no. 3 on account of default on part of the petitioner in paying the installments, exercised its right to possess the vehicle. Accordingly, its possession was taken on 23/5/2021 by respondent no. 3. Thereafter, respondent no. 3 requested the Regional Transport Officer, Bareilly by filing Form-36 to issue fresh Registration Certificate (for short 'RC') in its name. When the R.T.O. did not transfer the vehicle in favour of respondent no. 3 even after lapse of considerable time, it filed writ petition No. 7366 of 2023 before this Court with the aforesaid grievance. The writ petition was disposed of vide order dtd. 28/4/2023 directing the R.T.O. to take final decision in the matter within six weeks. Thereafter, the R.T.O. has passed the impugned order dtd. 14/6/2023, directing for grant of fresh Registration Certificate for the remaining period of validity in favour of respondent no. 3 after realizing requisite fee in exercise of power under Sec. 51(5) of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988.