LAWS(ALL)-2023-3-20

MOHD. ANWAR Vs. STATE OF U.P.

Decided On March 21, 2023
Mohd. Anwar Appellant
V/S
STATE OF U.P. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Sanjay Kumar Rao, learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.

(2.) The applicant has been enlarged on bail in all four cases lodged against him. The trial court has fixed a separate surety for each case. However he has not been set at liberty as he is unable to arrange sureties in aforesaid four cases. The aforesaid cases are connected to the offences committed by the company against different investors.

(3.) The prayer made by Sri Sanjay Kumar Rao, learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant may be permitted to produce a single surety for the aforesaid four cases so that he is set at liberty in pursuance of the bail order. The learned counsel contends that he cannot make good the said demand of four separate sureties due to financial penury. Relying on various authorities of constitutional courts it is submitted that the demand of four sureties is arbitrary. Learned AGA contends that sureties serve an important role. But fairly admits that sureties should be reasonable.