DAU DAYAL Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

(2.) In reply to the above contention, it is submitted by learned A.G.A., that there is no illegality in issuing the notice.

(3.) From the perusal of the impugned notice, it appears that the substance of allegations made against the applicant has not been mentioned. It is a vague notice, therefore it is hereby quashed.