SHYAM RAJI Vs. DDC

JUDGEMENT

(1.) It is utterly confusing that for substitution of the legal representatives of petitioner three applications have been filed and each application is supported by separate affidavit. One application is for substitution, the other is for setting aside the abatement (as the substitution application has been filed after 150 days of death) and the third application is for condonation of delay. In writ petitions there is absolutely no requirement of filing application for setting aside abatement for the reason that as held by the Supreme Court in Puran Singh v. State of Punjab, 1996 AIR(SC) 1092 there is no question of automatic abatement of writ proceedings. Part of para 10 of the said authority is quoted below:--

(2.) Unnecessary affidavits and applications amount to wastage of paper and unnecessarily make the file voluminous.

(3.) Registrar and Registrar listing both are directed to ensure that in future office will not refuse to accept any substitution application if prayer for substitution and condonation of delay is made in the same application (after affixing Court fees stamp of Rs. 10/-) or substitution application and delay condonation applications are supported by one affidavit in writ petitions. Similarly in appeals all the three applications (substitution, setting aside of abatement and delay condonation) may be supported by one affidavit. Substitution application to bring on record legal representatives of sole petitioner is allowed after condonation of delay in applying for the same.