(1.) Heard Sri Prashant Mishra, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sanjeev Singh, learned Counsel for respondents No. 3/1 and 3/2.
(2.) Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that pursuant to an oral gift, petitioner became owner of property in dispute but the Trial Court has found that petitioner could not prove factum of oral gift of the property in dispute in her favour and this findings of fact having not been found erroneous by Revisional Court, this Court while considering a case under Article 226/227 could not interfere particularly when this findings have not been shown perverse or contrary to record. The scope of judicial review in the matter arising out of the proceedings and judgments of the Courts below is very limited. The writ petitions under Article 226/227 in such matters have not to be taken up like a regular appeal.
(3.) Both the Courts below have recorded concurrent findings of fact and unless these findings are shown perverse or contrary to record resulting in grave injustice to petitioner, in writ jurisdiction under Article 226/227, this Court exercising restricted and narrow jurisdiction would not be justified in interfering with the same.
ABOUT US "REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD." is a Company incorporated in 1991 under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. Since its inception to 1995, the Company was busy in carrying out the activities related to various Banks' Job Work..
Read More
Sales: sales@the-laws.com
Support: info@the-laws.com
8000853936
9376168072
27, 4TH FLOOR, Agrawal Center, Ashram Road, Income Tax, Ahmadabad 380014.
LOGIN