PARAMJEET Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri A.N. Pandey, counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rajesh Kumar holding brief of Sri Shivanand Mishra.

(2.) THE writ petition has been filed against the order of Settlement Officer, Consolidation dated 4.3.2013 and Deputy Director of Consolidation dated 1.7.2013 passed in chak allotment proceedings.? During allotment proceedings a chak road was carved out in between plot no. 95 and 96. While deciding the chak objections of the village, the Consolidation Officer by the order dated 8.2.2013 has taken the land on plot no. 95 and 96 from the chak road and allotted a chak road by the side on plot no. 91 and 92 etc. Due to order of Consolidation Officer, the chak road which was in straightaway, has been turned at plot no. 92.

(3.) THE counsel for the petitioner submitted that the chak road as carved out is up to the sahen land of respondent -5, therefore, the way of the petitioner to village abadi up to his house has been blocked. He submits that as the Deputy Director of Consolidation has not made any spot inspection, as such, this anomaly could neither be noticed nor it was considered.