REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Shyoraj Singh Appellant

V/S

ZAHIR AHMAD Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

MT.RAMDULARI KUER AND OTHERS VS. UPENDRA NATH BASU [REFERRED TO]
CHANAN SINGH VS. WARAYAM SINGH [REFERRED TO]
SAILA BALA DASSI VS. NIRMALA SUNDARI DASSI [REFERRED TO]
GURBAKSH SINGH VS. NIKKA SINGH [REFERRED TO]
SARVINDER SINGH VS. DALIP SINGH [REFERRED TO]
AMIT KUMAR SHAW VS. FARIDA KHATOON [REFERRED TO]
JAGAN SINGH DEAD THROUGH LRS VS. DHANWANTI [REFERRED TO]
LOV RAJ KUMAR VS. MAJOR DAYA SHANKAR [REFERRED TO]
NARENDRABHAI CHHAGANBHAI BHARATIA VS. GANDEVI PEOPLES CO OP BANK LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
AMARNATH VS. DY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION KANPUR [REFERRED TO]
MOHD ALEEM VS. MAQSOOD ALAM [REFERRED TO]
LAKSHAN CHUNDER DEY VS. SMNIKUNJAMONI DASSI [REFERRED TO]
HIRANYA BHUSAN MUKHERJEE VS. GOURI DUTT MAHARAJ [REFERRED TO]
SHYAM LAL VS. SOHAN LAL [REFERRED TO]
GOURI DUTT MAHARAJ VS. SUKUR MOHAMMED [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Namwar Singh and Sri Lalit Kumar, Advocates for appellants and Sri R.K. Pandey, Advocate for respondents.

(2.) The only substantial question of law which was formulated in this appeal after hearing under Order 41 Rule 11 C.P.C. is:

(3.) It is evident from record that Original Suit No. 115 of 1969 instituted by Sri Haji Bashir Ahmad (since deceased and substituted by his legal heirs) resulted in a compromise decree as a result whereof defendant-vendor, who executed sale deed in favour of plaintiffs, in respect to property in dispute, became incompetent to possess any right over the said property and hence could not have conferred title upon plaintiffs. The present plaintiffs-appellants are purchaser of disputed property during pendency of the aforesaid suit.

Click here to view full judgment.

SHYORAJ SINGH Vs. ZAHIR AHMAD

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address