ASHOK KUMAR TIWARI Vs. D.I.O.S.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri Gajendra Pratap, learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel.

(2.) BY means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has approached this Court challenging the legality, and validity of the order dated 29.01.2003 passed by the District Inspector of schools. Further a writ of mandamus has also been claimed commanding the respondents to approve appointment of the petitioner and to pay regular salary as LT Grade Teacher in the institution.

(3.) THE matter was reconsidered by the District Inspector of Schools and again vide order dated 29.01.2003, impugned in this petition, appointment of the petitioner has been disapproved on the ground that in view of the strength of the students, according to standard (MANAK), there could be only 11 posts in the institution against which 14 teachers are working and thus, the appointments have been made in excess with sanctioned post.