GRAN SURJIT CINEPLEX Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) We have heard Shri Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel appears for the State respondents.

(2.) By this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-

(3.) Earlier the petitioner had filed a Writ Petition No.544 of 2013, which was found to be defective as the order of the District Magistrate dated 10.07.2009 was not challenged by the petitioner. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh writ petition challenging the order of the District Magistrate, if he is so advised.