RAJU AND SEVEN Vs. HARAGUN ALIAS HUKMA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri H.K. Yadav, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri Sujeet Kumar, learned counsel for respondents.

(2.) Following two substantial questions of law are involved in this case:

(3.) The courts below have held that will dated 28.07.1993 was not proved since there were two attesting witnesses, namely, Samaliya and Ghanshyam but none of them were produced to prove execution and attestation of will and, therefore, the will was not proved in accordance with law.