ONKAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri Vijit Saxena, along with Sri Kuldeep Saxena, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State -respondents.

(2.) THROUGH this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for issuing a writ of certiorari quashing the notice dated 17.4.2013 issued by the Collector, Meerut under section 166/167 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950.?

(3.) SITTING under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, I am not inclined to interfere in this matter.? The petitioners, if so advised, may file their reply to the show cause notice, which is impugned here in the present writ petition, before the authority concerned where the matter is pending.? In case such objection is taken, that may be considered and decided by passing a reasoned speaking order before deciding the matter on merit.?