NARENDRA SINGH Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

(2.) The appellant has challenged the order and judgement dated 19.3.2013 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ-A no. 15405 of 2013, Narendra Singh Vs. State of U.P. and others by which the court has opined that petitioner will not be able to get any relief even if the aforesaid writ petition is entertained. The aforesaid judgement and order dated 19.3.2013 reads thus.

(3.) The grievance of the appellant is that the impugned order dated 19.3.2013 effects his legal right of appointment and in view of the fact that it is settled law that the party claiming fundamental right must move the court before the others' right come in existence; that the action of the court cannot harms innocent parties if their rights immersed by reason of delay on the part of the persons moving the Court. Therefore, the observation of the Court in the impugned order that even if the services of the respondent no.6 are terminated and are held to be unlawful as on date the claim of the petitioner cannot be countenanced on the post of the panel of 1992.