RAVINDER KUMAR Vs. COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT

JUDGEMENT

(1.) In this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for following reliefs.:

(2.) I have heard Shri Ajay Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Ravindra Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioners has relied upon the judgment dated 20.3.1997 passed by this Court in writ petition No. 135 of 1995 Vishambhar Singh and others v. Cooperative Cane Development Union and others and in the case of Smt. Nirmal Rani v. State of U.P. and others, 2000 1 ESC 187 . On the other hand Sri Ravindra Singh, learned counsel for the respondents has placed reliance on the judgment of this Court in the case of Babu Ram and another v. Deputy Cane Commissioner, Moradabad Division, Moradabad and others, 2000 1 UPLBEC 422, which has been followed in the judgment dated 21.2.2013 passed in Writ A No. 48242 of 2002 Anand Kumar and others v. Cane Development Cooperative Society Ltd. Shri Ravindra Singh, learned counsel for the respondents further submits that in the case of Vishambhar Singh relied by the petitioner was considered in the case of Babu Ram and it was held that for promotion to the post of Seasonal Clerk, it is mandatory that the employee must possess minimum qualification of high school and "Prathma" is not a recognized certificate.