RINKU KUSHWAHA Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is third application for bail in Case Crime No.124 of 2012 under Sections 394/411 I.P.C., Police Station Harchandpur, District Raebareli.

(2.) LEARNED counsel for the applicant contends that two of the witnesses have already deposed on behalf of the prosecution. The accused present in court were not identified. I have gone through contents of the statement. Observations by the Bail Court are not required to be made in regard to quality of evidence. Suffice it to say that the trial is at the stage of recording evidence. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Akil @ Javed Vs. State (NCT of Delhi) reported in (2013) 7 SCC 125 has held in following terms:

(3.) CONSIDERING stage of trial, this application for bail is dismissed, however, with directions to the trial court to proceed with trial strictly in accordance with judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, portion of which is extracted hereinabove.