REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

GIRISH CHANDRA Appellant

V/S

SHEO NATH Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

S M KARIM VS. BIBI SAKINA [REFERRED TO]
PARSINNI VS. SUKHI [REFERRED TO]
MAHESH CHAND SHARMA VS. RAJ KUMARI SHARMA [REFERRED TO]
DEPUTY COLLECTOR MINICOY VS. NAVADIGOTHI MOHAMMED [REFERRED TO]
D N VENKATARAYAPPA VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [REFERRED TO]
MOHAMMAD ALI VS. JAGADISH KAKITA [REFERRED TO]
B LEELAVATHI VS. HONNAMMA [REFERRED TO]
T ANJANAPPA VS. SOMALINGAPPA [REFERRED TO]
HEMAJI WAGHAJI JAT VS. BHIKHABHAI KHENGARBHAI HARIJAN [REFERRED TO]
ASLAM ALIAS DEEWAN VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [REFERRED TO]
L N ASWATHAMA VS. P PRAKASH [REFERRED TO]
BISWANATH AGARWALLA VS. SABITRI BERA [REFERRED TO]
WG CDR RTD R N DAWAR VS. GANGA SARAN DHAMA [REFERRED TO]
BITOLA KUER VS. SRI RAM CHARAN [REFERRED TO]
PRABHU NARAIN SINGH VS. RAM NIRANJAN [REFERRED TO]
RAMZAN VS. GAFOORAN [REFERRED TO]
SRIBHAGWAN SINGH VS. RAMBASI KUER [REFERRED TO]
RAM CHARAN DAS VS. NAURANGI LAL [REFERRED TO]
BISHUN DAYAL VS. KESHO PRASAD [REFERRED TO]
EJAS ALI QIDWAI VS. SPECIAL MANAGER, COURT OF WARDS, BALRAMPUR ESTATE [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is plaintiff's appeal under Section 100 Code of Civil Procedure (for short "CPC").

(2.) SUIT No.87/9 of 1951 under Section 229/209(C) of U. P. Zamindari abolition and land reforms act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as Act No. 1 of 1951) was instituted by Girlish Chandra and three others, seeking a declaration that the defendant no.1 Shiv Nath has no concern with the property in dispute and his name has wrongly been entered in revenue records which should be corrected by issuing appropriate direction to concerned Tehsildar.

(3.) THE plaint was filed in the Court of Additional Sub Divisional Officer, Saidpur, District Ghaziapur.

Click here to view full judgment.

GIRISH CHANDRA Vs. SHEO NATH

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address