GARAHAN RAM Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. By the consent of the counsel for the parties, the petition is finally disposed of.

(2.) BY this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 1.2.2013 passed by the District Supply Officer by which order, the petitioner's fair price shop agreement has been suspended.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner challenging the order contended that the petitioner was appointed as fair price shop dealer by the order of Sub -Divisional Officer and the District Supply Officer has no jurisdiction to suspend the fair price shop agreement.