UTMA DEVI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) COUNTER affidavit filed today on behalf of contesting respondent is taken on record. It is not necessary to provide further time for filing of counter affidavits to the State - respondents, in view of the admitted facts, as they exist on record.

(2.) HEARD Sri Balwant Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Prabhakar Vardhan, learned counsel for the contesting respondent and learned Standing Counsel for the State - respondents.

(3.) PETITIONER along with 48 other members of the Kshetra Panchayat submitted a notice for no confidence motion being moved against the Block Pramukh under Section 15 of the Uttar Pradesh Khsetra Panchayat and Zila Panchayat Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act, 1961") on 3rd