REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Ratnesh Jaiswal Appellant

V/S

STATE OF U.P. Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

MOHD. YOUSUF V. SMT. AFAQ JAHAN AND ANOTHER [REFERRED TO]
R R CHARI VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
GOPAL DAS SINDHI VS. STATE OF ASSAM [REFERRED TO]
DEVARAPALLI LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY VS. V NARAYANA REDDY [REFERRED TO]
SHAKTI TRAVEL AND TOURS VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
NARSINGH DAS TAPADIA VS. GOVERDHAN DAS PARTANI [REFERRED TO]
BHAGAT RAM VS. SURINDER KUMAR [REFERRED TO]
DCM FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD VS. J N SAREEN [REFERRED TO]
FAKHRUDDIN AHMAD VS. STATE OF UTTARANCHAL [REFERRED TO]
R KALYANI VS. JANAK C MEHTA [REFERRED TO]
RAJ KUMAR KHURANA VS. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI [REFERRED TO]
HEM LATA GUPTA VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
SUPERINTENDENT AND REMEMBRANCER OF LEGAL AFFAIRS VS. ABANI KUMAR BANERJEE [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS criminal revision has been filed by the revisionist challenging the order dated 19.2.2011 passed by the learned 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Faizabad by which the appeal filed by Ramashanker Singh was allowed and impugned order under appeal was set aside.

(2.) HEARD Shri Rajendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist, Ms. Zeba Islam Siddiqui, learned AGA for the State respondent and Shri A.S. Gaur, learned counsel for respondent no.2.

(3.) THE very question involved in this criminal revision is that as to whether cognizance can be taken on a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Act prior to expiry of 15 days of the receipt of notice, and whether non matching of signatures on cheque do constitute an offence of Section 138 of the Act.

Click here to view full judgment.

RATNESH JAISWAL Vs. STATE OF U.P.

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address