RAM ASHRAY LAL Vs. KHALEEL AHMAD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri S.N. Jaiswal, learned counsel for the petitioners.

(2.) I have considered the argument advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

(3.) The issue for consideration is whether respondent-tenant is entitled to the benefit and adjustment of the amount deposited under Section 30(1) of the U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972 towards deposit to be made on or before first date of hearing under Order XV Rule 5 C.P.C. In so far as deposit of regular monthly rent during the continuance of the suit, there is no dispute that the said amount has been regularly deposited by the respondent-tenant before the Court.