SUDESH PAL Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Amit Kumar Singh, Advocate, holding brief of Sri P.K. Jain, learned counsel for appellants.

(2.) The only argument advanced by learned counsel for plaintiffs is that in khasra of 1337, disputed land was shown as Abadi in the possession of plaintiff-appellants but the same has been ignored by Courts below illegally though in view of aforesaid entry, plaintiff-appellants were entitled for benefit of Section 9 of U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (U.P. Act, No. 1 of 1951) (hereinafter referred to as "Act, 1950") and the Courts below have committed illegality in denying the same to plaintiffs on the basis of entry contained in the record of consolidation proceedings.

(3.) Section 9 of Act, 1950 reads as under: