RAM BALI Vs. DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri Anil Kumar Srivastava, for the petitioner and Sri Krishnaji Khare, and Sri Mahendra Pratap Yadav, for respondent -3. The respondent has filed Counter Affidavit at this stage as such with the consent of the parties, the writ petition is decided finally.

(2.) THE writ petition has been filed for quashing the orders of Settlement Officer Consolidation dated 06.11.2012 and Deputy Director Consolidation dated 06.09.2013, passed in chak allotment proceedings, under U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).

(3.) SITA Ram (respondent -3) filed an appeal (registered as Appeal No. 252) from the aforesaid order. Sita Ram (respondent -3) filed another appeal (registered as Appeal No. 253) from the order of Consolidation Officer dated 09.10.2012, passed in the case of Ram Baran. The Appeals were heard by Settlement Officer Consolidation, who by order dated 06.11.2012, allowed the appeal against the petitioner and restored the chak of the petitioner, as initially proposed to him.