GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. SURENDRA KUMAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri Nisheeth Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.B. Singhal, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Amit Krishan, appearing on behalf of the respondents.

(2.) BY means of the present petition, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 23rd June, 2011, passed by the State Public Services Tribunal, in Claim Petition No. 174 of 2011, by which the Tribunal has directed to consider the regularisation of the services of the respondents with effect from the date of existence of the vacancies, that is, 20th November, 2002, in accordance with the judgment of the High Court and also to grant all the consequential benefits arising out of it.

(3.) THE petitioner no.1, published an advertisement dated 20th November, 2002, inviting application for engagement on the post of Assistant Manager (Civil). The respondent no.1, who has been been engaged on the contractual basis, filed the writ petition, being Writ Petition No. 54072 of 2002, seeking the following reliefs: