VINOD KUMAR MISHRA Vs. GHANSHYAM DAS MAHESHWARI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Atul Dayal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Yogesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate holding brief on behalf of Sri Kushal Kant, learned counsel for respondents.

(2.) Sri Atul Dayal, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that under Section 17(1) the of Act, 1972 a landlord has been permitted to make nomination within 21 days and once nomination is made, thereafter the allotment has to be made in terms of nomination since it confers a right upon the person nominated by landlord and the Revisional Court has acted wholly illegally in passing the impugned judgment.

(3.) The submission is thoroughly misconceived.