MITHILESH JAIN Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) STANDING Counsel and Sri Pankaj Mittal may file counter-affidavit within three weeks.

(2.) ISSUE notice to respondent No. 4 returnable at an early date.

(3.) IN the present petition it has been stated in paragraphs 5 and 6 that in the residential area a shopping complex is being constructed and other commercial activities are proposed. IN our opinion this is clearly illegal. We, therefore, direct that no commercial or industrial activity will be allowed to be carried on in the area earmarked for residential purpose in the Master Plan of Agra or of in any other city in U. P. If commercial and industrial activities are being carried on in any city in U. P. in the areas earmarked for residential purposes in the Master Plan of that city such activity must immediately be stopped by the authorities.