RAM KISHORE Vs. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE FATEHPUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) -Sri S. K. Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, has made a statement that he may be permitted to delete the name of the respondent No. 3 from the array of parties. Permission prayed for is granted. Sri Mishra is directed to delete the name of the respondent No. 3 which he has done in the Court itself. Thereafter, the matter was heard on merits and it was dismissed by me on 23rd May, 2003 for the reasons to be recorded later on. Now, here are the reasons for dismissing the aforesaid writ petition.

(2.) THE petitioner, by means of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has challenged the order dated 27th February, 1984 passed by the Assistant Collector / Tehsildar, Bindaki, Fatehpur (Annexure-7 to the writ petition), and the order dated 15th November, 1984 passed by the Collector, Fatehpur (Annexure-8 to the writ petition).

(3.) AGAINST the order of the Assistant Collector/Tehsildar dated 24th December, 1979, a review application has been filed by Ram Krishna, whereby the Assistant Collector/Tehsildar has cancelled the order dated 24th December, 1979 and directed that notice be issued again in Form 49-Ka to the opposite party. Ram Kishore (O.P.) has submitted his objection to the notice referred to above that the Assistant Collector has passed the order after hearing the matter on merits on 24th December, 1979 which cannot be reviewed. The matter went upto the Additional Commissioner and thereafter the matter was heard and Ram Kishore has not appeared. Instead one Pradhan of the village, namely, Ram Sanehi and the Lekhpal were examined on behalf of Gaon Sabha.