PREMWATI Vs. CHIEF REVENUE OFFICER ALLAHABAD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) -Heard Sri Sankatha Rai, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri V. K. Singh appearing for the respondent No. 2 and Sri Neeraj Tiwari appearing for the contesting respondent No. 3. Respondent No. 4 being proforma respondent, notice has not been issued to him. As agreed by both the parties, the writ petition is being finally disposed of.

(2.) BY this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 2.7.2003 passed by the Chief Revenue Officer/Deputy Director of Consolidation, Allahabad.

(3.) SRI Neeraj Tiwari appearing for the contesting respondent contended that the respondent No. 3 is aggrieved person since he is affected by the order of the Settlement Officer of Consolidation. He further contended that the order of the Settlement Officer of Consolidation being ex parte there is no question of revision being barred by time. The counsel for both the parties relied on various decisions in support of their respective submissions which will be referred to while considering the aforesaid submissions.