RATNAKAR CHAUBEY Vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION VARANASI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 2.7.1991 passed by the Deputy Director of Education, Varanasi -respondent No. 1. Subsequently a prayer has been added for quashing the order dated 31.3.2000 passed by the Director of Education.

(2.) THE petitioner claims to have been appointed as C.T. Grade Teacher in the institution of respondent No. 3. His ad hoc appointment as C.T. Grade Teacher was initially approved by the District Inspector of Schools on 17.11.1984. The approval was thereafter extended upto 30.6.1986 vide order of the District Inspector of Schools dated 10.10.1985. Thereafter, when the appointment of the petitioner was not further extended by the Committee of Management, the petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 15176 of 1987, Ratnakar Chaubey v. District Inspector of Schools, in which initially an interim order was passed on 23.11.1987, but was subsequently vacated on 18.3.1988. In the said writ petition respondent No. 4. Rajendra Kumar Verma had been impleaded and had also filed counter -affidavit. On 5.12.1987 the District Inspector of Schools passed an order that the temporary appointment of the petitioner was approved till the regular appointment was made by the Commission or the approval was granted on the temporary appointment of Rajendra Kumar Verma, respondent No. 4. However, vide order dated 28.4.1988 of the District Inspector of Schools, the petitioner was allowed to continue on the post of C.T. Grade Teacher.

(3.) I have heard Sri G.K. Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri D.S.M. Tnpathi, learned Counsel for respondent No. 4 and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State -respondents and have also perused the record including the impugned orders.