AKEELA KHATOON Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) R. B. Misra, J. In this writ petition the prayer has been made commanding the respondents to make the payment of the pensionary benefits after taking into consideration the services rendered in the past and to pay G. P. F. , Gratuity and Group Insurance and arrears enhanced with interest is enclosed as (Annexures 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7) respectively in the writ petition.

(2.) HEARD Sri L. K. Pathak, learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri S. S. Sharma, Sri Raj Kumar, Miss Enakshi Sharma, learned Counsel for the State.

(3.) I have heard learned Counsel for the parties, I find that the petitioner had worked as Asstt. Teacher in Primary School and has worked as Asstt. Teacher in Junior High School and Asstt. Teacher in Government Girls Intermediate College and after completing 40 years of service she was retired and there was no complaint or inactive factor by virtue of pensionary benefits along with other benefits post retirement benefits are to be disallowed. The facts and circumstances of the petitioner's case are on better footing in comparison to the facts and circumstances rendered in the above cited case. Therefore, in the facts and circumstances the petitioner is to be given post retiral benefits after considering the past service rendered. As indicated above the petitioner cannot be claimed T. A. twice from the same journey made as indicated in the counter-affidavit.