GIRISH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS writ petition has been filed raising the grievance that petitioner had been allotted a place by the learned S.D.M., Kul Pahar, Mahoba, for running a photostat copy shop in tehsil premises. The term has expired, and though the petitioner had deposited the amount further, instead of allowing him to continue, respondent No. 5 is going to be allotted the said photostat copy shop's premises.

(2.) THE learned standing counsel has raised the serious objection that there is no provision for this kind of allotment either to the petitioner or somebody else, and in absence of any statutory rules, the land etc. should be allotted either by inviting tender or holding public auction.

(3.) IN Ram and Shyam Co. v. State of Haryana, AIR 1985 SC 1147, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held as under :