(1.) THROUGH this writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner detenu, Raju Kannaujia has impugned the order dated 30-9-2002 passed by Mr. Alok Kumar, District Magistrate, Faizabad (opposite party No. 2) detaining him under Section 3 (2) of the National Security Act. The detention order alongwith grounds of detention, which was also dated 30-9-2002, was served on the petitioner-detenu on 30- 9-2002 itself and their true copies have been annexed as Annexure Nos. 1 and 2 respectively to this writ petition.
(2.) THE prejudicial activities of the petitioner-detenu prompting the opposite party No. 2 to issue the impugned detention order against him are contained in the grounds of detention. Since, in our view, a reference to them is not necessary for the adjudication of the pleadings contained in paragraph 14 of the petition and ground-I of paragraph 18 thereof, on which alone this writ petition deserves to succeed, we are not adverting to them.
(3.) MR. A. R. Siddiqui, learned counsel for the petitioner-detenu pointed out that the averments contained in paragraph 14 of the petition have been replied to in paragraph 13 of the return of the detaining authority. He urged that a perusal of the said paragraph shows that the petitioner's representation dated 11-10- 2002 addressed to Home Secretary, State of U. P. was delivered in his office on the said date and on the following day i. e. on 12-10-2002 he alongwith his parawise comments, sent it to Principal Secretary, Home, U. P. Government, which was received by the State Government on that very date (12-10-2002 ). MR. A. R. Siddiqui also invited our attention to paragraph 3 of the return of MR. C. P. Singh, Deputy Secretary, Home and Confidential Department, U. P. , Civil Secretariat, Lucknow. He pointed out that in the said paragraph, it has been averred as under the representation of the petitioner-detenu addressed to the State Government forwarded by the District Magistrate, Faizabad on 12-10-2002, was received in the concerned Section on 17-10-2002. Since 20-10-2002 and 21-10-2002 were public holidays, on account of Sunday and Maharshi Balmiki Jayanti, the concerned section examined it on 22-10-2002. On the said date, the Special Secretary also examined it. On 23-10-2002, it was sent to the Secretary. On 24- 10-2002 it was rejected by the State Government and on 26-10-2002, the petitioner was communicated the factum of rejection.