COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT M S D K UCHCHATAR MADHYAMIK VIDYALAYA MEJA ALLAHABAD Vs. DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS ALLAHABAD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) -Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri D. K. Srivastava who has filed caveat on behalf of respondent No. 3 and learned standing counsel.

(2.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner has argued that the respondent No. 3 has already been dismissed but neither there is any material nor any statement that the dismissal of the respondent No. 3 has been approved by the District Inspector of Schools, which under law is required to be proved.

(3.) IN view of what has been stated above, this writ petition challenging the order dated 31.3.2003, has no force and is accordingly dismissed. However, it is directed that till the District INspector of Schools takes a decision with regard to the matter of approval or disapproval of dismissal of respondent No. 3, no payment of salary shall be made to the respondent No. 3. Petitioner is directed to furnish all the relevant materials within four weeks from today on which District INspector of Schools shall take decision regarding approval or disapproval regarding dismissal within six weeks thereafter.