MANJULA KUMAR Vs. CHANCELLOR ROHILKHAND UNIVERSITY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner has challenged the order of the Chancellor dated 5 -9 -2003 vide Annexure -21. Heard counsels for the parties. Admittedly a reference under Section 68 of the U.P. State Universities Act is pending before the Chancellor. We have repeatedly held in several Division Bench decisions that the Chancellor has got power to pass an interim order pending final decision in a reference under Section 68 as that is inherent in Section 68 of the aforesaid Act.

(2.) WE are surprised to note that the Chancellor in the impugned order dated 5 -9 -2003 (Annexure -21 to the writ petition) has observed that he has no power to grant an interim order. We are constrained to observe that even the Chancellor is not above the law. When we have declared the law repeatedly in several Division Bench decisions e.g., P.G. Chaudhari v. The Chancellor, 1987 UPLBEC 720, Writ Petition No. 48670 -02, Committee of Management Sarvoday P.G. College, Jhansi v. D.I.O.S., decided on 27 -8 -2003 etc. (Vide Annexure -21 to the petition) etc. it was not open to the Chancellor to persist in his wholly illegal stand that he has no power to grant an interim order. This is a country ruled by law and even the Chancellor has to abide by the law. As the Supreme Court observed “be you howsoever so high the law is above you.” We, therefore, regret to note that such a high authority as the Chancellor is persisting in taking an illegal stand by stating that he has no power to grant an interim order, when we have repeatedly held that he does.