LAWS(ALL)-2003-3-90

ANIL KUMAR DHAWAN Vs. PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY MORADABAD

Decided On March 31, 2003
Anil Kumar Dhawan Appellant
V/S
PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY MORADABAD Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia praying for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commending the respondent No. 1 (Prescribed Authority, Moradabad) to decide the implement application No. 36 Ga filed by the petitioner before delivery of the judgment in PA Case No. 4 of 2002.

(2.) THE dispute relates to an accommodation the details whereof have been given in the release application referred to hereinafter. The said accommodation has hereinafter been referred to as “the disputed accommodation”.

(3.) IT further appears that the said Smt. Shyama Dhawan (respondent No. 4) contested the said release application and filed her written statement. Copy of the written statement has been filed as Annexure No. 2 to the writ petition.