MOHAMMAD MATLUK Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) K. N. Ojha, J. Heard Sri R. K. Sharma, learned counsel for the revisionists and Sri Shekhar Yadav, learned A. G. A. and have gone through the impugned order dated 15-7-2003 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Hapur in complaint case No. 1697 of 2002, Vedpal v. Matluk and others, by which the revisionists have been summoned to face the trial under Sections 307 and 506 I. P. C.

(2.) A perusal of the impugned order dated 15-7-2003 shows that according to complainant Vedpal he had taken land on rent from Har Karan Singh on 31-3-2003 on payment of Rs. 34,500 and had sown sugarcane crop on the land. Har Karan Singh executed sale deed of the land on 28-5-2003 in favour of the revisionists who threatened to kill complainant in case he did not part with the possession of the land. He insisted to it as he had made payment of money of the land. Therefore, the liability had passed from Har Karan Singh to revisionists and he would not part with the land. On 27-8-2001 when the complainant had gone to Hapur Mohd. Matluk was driving the scooter and the revisionists Khalid and Aslam fired causing injuries on his chest and arm. The occurrence was seen by witnesses Mahabir, Balwant Singh and others, but the accused persons were successful in making their escape good. The complaint was filed under Section 22 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The statements of P. W. 1 Balwant Singh, P. W. 2 Manveer and P. W. 3 Dr. Ghanshyam Singh were recorded under Sections 200 and 202 Cr. P. C.

(3.) THEREFORE, the revision is dismissed at the admission stage. Revision dismissed. .