SUDHIR PRAKASH SHARMA Vs. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE PILIBHIT

JUDGEMENT

(1.) RAKESH Tiwari, J. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties and perused the records.

(2.) THE petitioner has challenged the order of his termination from service dated 22-2-1993 passed by respondent No. 1. Annexure-3 to the writ petition.

(3.) IT is alleged that the appointing authority of the peons is Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Bisalpur, respondent No. 2, but the impugned order of termination from service was passed in compliance of the order of the District Magistrate, Pilibhit, respondent No. 1. IT is further alleged that before passing the impugned order dated 22-2-1993, neither the District Magistrate, Pilibhit, respondent No. 1 nor Sub- Divisional Magistrate, Pilibhit, respondent No. 2 issued any show-cause notice to the petitioner nor any opportunity of hearing was given to him. IT is further contended that the provisions of Section 6-N of the U. P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 have been violated.