RAM KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THESE aforesaid two criminal appeals have been filed against the judgment and order dated 10.9.1991, passed by the IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Rae Bareilly in S.T. No. 195 of 1990 connected with S.T. No. 194 of 1990 convicting appellant Ram Kumar under Section 366, I.P.C. and sentencing him to undergo for four years' R.I. and also convicting accused-appellant Parashu Ram Yadav under Sections 366 and 376, I.P.C. and sentencing him to four years' R.I. under Section 366, I.P.C. and seven years' R.I. under Section 376, I.P.C.

(2.) HEARD the learned counsel for the accused-appellants and the learned Additional Government Advocate.

(3.) AFTER committal to the Court of Sessions, the accused Parashu Ram was charged under Sections 366 and 376, I.P.C. and accused Ram Kumar was charged under Section 366, I.P.C. The accused-persons pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. Accused Ram Kumar has stated that he was doing labour with complainant Jagdish Prasad and as he has not given his full wages, therefore, he stopped the work and therefore, he has been falsely implicated in this case. Accused Parashu Ram has also stated that he has been falsely implicated in this case due to enmity.