PHOOL CHAND Vs. LALTA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) S. P. Pandey, Member. This is a revision petition under Section 333 of the UPZA & LR Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act), preferred against the judgment and order, dated 5-3-1990, passed by the learned Additional Commissioner, Varanasi Division, Varanasi, in Revision Petition No. 195/101 of 1985, dismissing the same and confirming the judgment and order, dated 20-7-1985 passed by the learned trial Court on a restoration application filed in a suit under Section 161 of the Act.

(2.) BRIEFLY stated, the facts, giving rise to the instant revision petition are that in proceedings under Section 161 of the Act, agreeing with the tehsil report, the learned trial Court passed the orders accordingly on 21-2-1984. Thereafter, on 30-5-1984, an application for restoration was moved by the revisionist, praying for recall of the order, dated 21-2-1984 along with an affidavit. The learned trial Court vide its order, dated 20-7-1985, rejected this application. Phool Chand went up in revision before the learned Additional Commissioner which, too, was dismissed vide his order, dated 5-3-1990 and therefore, it is against these orders that the instant revision petition has been preferred by him before the Board.

(3.) IN veiw of the above, this revision petition being devoid of merits, is accordingly dismissed and the impugned orders passed by the learned Courts below are hereby, confirmed and maintained. Let records be returned forthwith, to the Courts concerned. Revision dismissed. .