PUTTU LAL SASHTRI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) -Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

(2.) BY means of this writ petition, the order dated 22.4.2000 passed by the District Basic Education Officer, Shahjahanpur dismissing the petitioner from service w.e.f. 30.6.1987 has been challenged.

(3.) IN the meantime, the District Basic Education Officer vide letter dated 11.4.2000 directed the petitioner to appear before him regarding finalization of his retiral benefits. It is alleged that the copy of the order was not served upon the petitioner and vide order dated 22.4.2000 the petitioner was dismissed from service w.e.f. 30.6.1987 the date of superannuation of the petitioner from service.