(1.) V. K. Mittal, C. C. R. A. This revision has been preferred under Section 56 (1) of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 against the order dated 16- 4-2001 passed by the Collector, Sravasti.
(2.) HEARD the learned Counsel for the parties and perused the relevant papers on file.
(3.) IN these circumstances I find that the Collector has passed a well reasoned order giving detailed justification for evaluating the price of land and thus the stamp duty. I, therefore, do not find any infirmity in the impugned order dated 16-4-2001 which is liable to be sustained.