(1.) IN this case, Sri RK Gulati was counsel for the assessee. He was elevated to the Bench and thereafter retired. On 10 -12 -2002, notice was issued to the assessee to engage another counsel. The office note dated 23 -6 -2003 states that neither acknowledgement nor undelivered cover has returned back after service. Hence, in view of the Explanation -II to Chapter VIII, rule 12 of the High Court Rules, service is deemed sufficient.
(2.) THIS is a reference under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, in which the following question has been referred to us for our opinion :
(3.) FOLLOWING the said decision, the reference is answered in the negative, i.e., in favour of the department and against the assessee.