KALOO SINGH Vs. APPER AAYUKT SAVITRI DEVI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) RAJESH Tandon, J. Heard Sri Rajendra Dobhal for the revisionist and Sri N. C. Gupta, Standing Counsel for the respondent.

(2.) THIS revision has been filed against the order passed by the District Judge, Uttarkashi rejecting the application for amendment under Order VI, Rule 17 of the CPC vide order dated 22-5-1986 passed in original suit No. 9 of 1985 Keshwa Nand Puri v. State of U. P. through Collector Uttarkashi.

(3.) THE plaintiff/applicant for amendment in the plaint, the same having been rejected by the learned District Judge vide his order dated 22-5-1996. THE order has been challenged by filing the present revision under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure.