HARI PRASAD SINGH Vs. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE RAILWAYS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) The petitioner is challenging the impugned order of termination of service dated 14.11.1992 Annexure-1 to the writ petition which has been upheld in appeal by order dated 11.6.1993- vide Annexure-2 and in further appeal by order dated 23.11.1993 vide Annexure-3. Against this order the petitioner had approached the U. P. Public Service Tribunal but the Tribunal has rejected his claim petition vide order dated 21.6.2001 Annexure-4 to the writ petition.

(3.) We have carefully perused the impugned order and find no illegality in the same.