ANUROOP Vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION JAUNPUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IMPUGNED herein are the judgments dated 6 -9 -2003 and 7 -7 -2002 passed by Deputy Director Consolidation and Settlement Officer Consolidation Jaunpur respectively.

(2.) I have heard Sri R.S. Verma, for the petitioner and Sri K.C.K. Srivastava, appearing for the Opp. Parties. Both the counsel conjoined to urge that the matter may be decided at this stage. Learned counsel for the petitioners preferred not to file rejoinder affidavit and submitted that the matter may be decided on the basis of respective contentions made across the bar and averments as embodied in the writ petition and counter affidavit. In the above perspective, I feel inclined to decide the matter at the very threshold.

(3.) THE man stay of petitioner's argument revolves round the ground that the orders impugned are bereft of reasons and suffer from non -application of mind verging on violation of the conditions contained in Section 19 (1) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act.